The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-02-2007, 07:01 PM   #76
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Pussy. :p
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2007, 07:16 PM   #77
JayMcGee
Cardigan-wearing man
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Much Binding In The Marsh
Posts: 1,082
damm' right.... and I intend to keep my gonads.....
__________________
I *like* wearing cardigans...... my current favourite is an orange cable-knit with real leatherette buttons.
JayMcGee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2007, 07:38 PM   #78
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 02:49 PM   #79
Urbane Guerrilla
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanaC View Post
Umm.....2nd millenium isn't paleolithic. Plenty of written sources from the 2nd millenium. Or are you talking about something else?
I am; the early Paleolithic -- maybe two million BC.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.
Urbane Guerrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 03:27 PM   #80
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
I see. out of interest, remind me what that was in response to?
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 12:16 AM   #81
Urbane Guerrilla
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,674
Post #60, quoting a little of post #45 which I thought dubious. #45's on p. 3.
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.
Urbane Guerrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 03:48 AM   #82
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Ahhh..Gotcha thanks, I did scan for it, but must have skipped over it:P
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 04:58 AM   #83
bluecuracao
in a mood, not cupcake
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by yesman065 View Post
500 or a 1000 years ago every thing was male dominated.
Nooo no, not everything, back then. NOW, yes, despite feminism--which we desperately needed, by the way:

http://www.office-humour.co.uk/g/i/3796/
bluecuracao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 09:30 AM   #84
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
Blue the date on that is from 1955, when the typical role of a woman was to be the homemaker. Today's dual income society has created a situation where women are not only allowed, but mostly expected to generate and income. For good or bad.
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 10:19 AM   #85
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
Quote:
Originally Posted by yesman065 View Post
Blue the date on that is from 1955, when the typical role of a woman was to be the homemaker. Today's dual income society has created a situation where women are not only allowed, but mostly expected to generate and income. For good or bad.
If the result is that women aren't expected to be their husband's namby pamby ass-kissing slave, I'd say that's good.

People don't have to be two income families for the most part: people choose it for a number of reasons...a big house, nice cars. Keeping up with the Joneses.

And, some women LIKE to work.
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 10:57 AM   #86
bluecuracao
in a mood, not cupcake
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,034
yesman, you might have misunderstood me--which is understandable, because my punctuation often sucks. I'll try to clarify my point...

a) 500, 1000, and more years ago, there were many societies that were female-dominated.

b) Today, more than the opposite is true. Most societies are male-dominated--look at business, government, religion, law enforcement, military.

c) Yes, the Good Housekeeping feature was dated 1955. Yes, most married women were expected to only be housewives, but there's some extra frightening shit in that article. That's why I said we desperately needed feminism, to get people out of that sado-masochistic circle of hell.

d) So today, women are in the workplace in great numbers, whether it be for single or dual incomes. And they don't have some mainstream magazine telling them they should sit tight when their hubby's out all night, and smile sweetly when his cheatin' drunky-ness comes home in the morning. These were the results of feminism. However, see b).
bluecuracao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 01:50 PM   #87
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawnee123 View Post
People don't have to be two income families for the most part: people choose it for a number of reasons...a big house, nice cars. Keeping up with the Joneses.
Well I couldn't do it, I guess that was my fault though for not making enough money to support 5 people. Either way, I have NO PROBLEM with women working if they want to, but around here anyway, it seems that you really need two incomes just to get by in relative comfort.
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 02:31 PM   #88
Shawnee123
Why, you're a regular Alfred E Einstein, ain't ya?
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,206
Hence me saying "for the most part." I agree that it's hard to get by these days, but we are creatures of comfort.

When you said "my fault for not making enough money" it made me sad; I have gotten into arguments with people on here before who have implied that by working hard you will make more money, as if people who don't make a lot of money don't work hard. I am a living example that's not true, and I hope you know I meant no offense in my statement about working families. I'm guessing you're a pretty good guy who takes care of his family any way he can.
__________________
A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones who need the advice.
--Bill Cosby
Shawnee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 11:22 PM   #89
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluecuracao View Post
a) 500, 1000, and more years ago, there were many societies that were female-dominated.
Cite?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 11:35 PM   #90
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
Shawnee, No offense taken. I spent too much time working harder instead of smarter. I also learned how unappreciated all my efforts were. Since that realization, I only work one job and make more than when I had three and I no longer have the "unappreciated one" sucking the life outta me
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.