![]() |
|
Technology Computing, programming, science, electronics, telecommunications, etc. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
Global Warming, what again?
I just noticed we have science under technology on the front page. That makes no sense but anyway...
I don't know if this study came out while I was on vacation but it went below my radar screen. It seems that University of Ottawa geology professor Dr. Jan Veizer and astrophysicist Dr. Nir J. Shaviv have connected their work across specialties, casting doubt on the increased carbon dioxide = global warming theory. By analyzing the fossilized remains of seashells, Veizer has been able to reconstruct the Earth's temperature record for the past half-billion years, the period during which there have been hard-shelled sea creatures. Surprisingly, this record displays a repeating cycle of temperature increases and decreases every 135 million years, a period that corresponds with no known terrestrial phenomena. Independently, Shaviv had determined galactic cosmic rays striking the Earth have been varying with about the same periodicity over an even longer time frame. Once Veizer and Shaviv made the connection, they wondered whether they were looking at a reflection of some sort of regular celestial phenomenon in the climate history of the Earth. Indeed, it appears they were. Our solar system passes through the bright arms of the Milky Way Galaxy with approximately the same regularity as the long-term temperature changes Veizer had discovered. And because interstellar matter bunches up in the galaxy's arms, we see the birth of large, very bright, but short-lived stars that end their lives as supernovas while still inside the arms, giving off powerful bursts of galactic cosmic rays. Read the whole article, it makes sense. The big question I have is whether or not he missuses "less" when talking about clouds. I'm thinking it should be fewer clouds/less cloud cover. Of course, those who for political reasons want global warming to be man's fault will find the article absurd, while folks who for political reasons, like myself, don't want global warming to be man's fault will embrace it. ![]()
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Great find, Griff. It probably went under your radar because of the lack of reporting.
Quote:
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
-When we are out of the arms and galactic cosmic ray strength is low, there are less clouds and the Earth is warmer.
Can I have a ruling on this?
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Fewer clouds.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
Seconded. New business?
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
A real easy tip-off is that "less" should basically never be preceeded with "are".
You use "less" when talking about something that cannot be quantified. "There is less soda than there used to be." is a proper English sentence. "There is less sand here than in California." But if you're talking about specific objects instead of one big general thing - "There are less sand particles here than in California" - uh, no. So that's when you use "fewer". "There are fewer sand particles here than in California." I commonly made this mistake up until about two years ago, until I thought about it, and now I catch other people doing it all the time while completely avoiding it myself. It's really a simple re-training of the brain. Fewer dogs, less dog shit. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
Fewer vs less is one of those things which I naturally detect and find annoying but I usually don't say anything since I'm so sloppy with other aspects of writing, like throwing commas around like rice at a wedding. These kinds of errors chip away at your credibility, which is especially important when what you're writing is highly technical and you want to be perceived as an expert.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Well they are Canadians, after all.
![]()
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
If these are the same guys I read about in the WSJ last Monday, then they have some credibility problems. One, the paper was very subjective and short on specific numbers. Two, they refused to provide raw data to peers for analysis. Three, they refuse to answer questions beyond saying their paper speaks for itself.
In the meantime, this is the data that were being discussed so subjectively. Notice how temperature rises are associated with CO2 levels, and the sharp and unpresidented temperature change only in the past 100 years: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
OK, so the CO2 follows along with the temperture changes. At least at Antartica.
And I see several temperature changes as or more precipitous as the current one. Higher peaks too.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. Last edited by xoxoxoBruce; 07-23-2003 at 09:48 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Professor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,788
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
He who reads, sometimes writes.
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: at the keyboard
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
Yep, I'm a grammar Nazi as well. ![]() As a quick rule along with Dave's, use "fewer" with countable nouns (ie people, cars, clouds), and use "less" with uncountable things (ie love, conceptual money, Canadians). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
Quote:
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
And in any case, there's really no point at all in debating it.
As the chart clearly shows, we would have to return to pre-industrial age levels of consumption in order to prevent this phenomenon. If that were to be implemented, billions upon billions of people would die of poverty, as the earth can't support this many people without things like transportation and the modern energy grid. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Neophyte-in-training
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Phila
Posts: 3
|
I think that studies like these really give some insight, but are they really necessary
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|