The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Technology
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Technology Computing, programming, science, electronics, telecommunications, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-16-2011, 10:00 AM   #1
HungLikeJesus
Only looks like a disaster tourist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: above 7,000 feet
Posts: 7,208
Interesting "Laws"

Stigler's Law of Eponymy

From Wikipedia:
Quote:
Stigler's law of eponymy is a process proposed by University of Chicago statistics professor Stephen Stigler in his 1980 publication "Stigler’s law of eponymy." In its simplest and strongest form it says: "No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." Stigler named the sociologist Robert K. Merton as the discoverer of "Stigler's law", consciously making "Stigler's law" exemplify Stigler's law.
__________________
Keep Your Bodies Off My Lawn

SteveDallas's Random Thread Picker.

Last edited by HungLikeJesus; 12-16-2011 at 10:10 AM. Reason: Added link
HungLikeJesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 10:06 AM   #2
HungLikeJesus
Only looks like a disaster tourist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: above 7,000 feet
Posts: 7,208
Benford's Law
From Wikipedia:

Quote:
Benford's Law, also called the first-digit law, states that in lists of numbers from many (but not all) real-life sources of data, the leading digit is distributed in a specific, non-uniform way. According to this law, the first digit is 1 about 30% of the time, and larger digits occur as the leading digit with lower and lower frequency, to the point where 9 as a first digit occurs less than 5% of the time. This distribution of first digits is the same as the widths of gridlines on the logarithmic scale.


This counter-intuitive result has been found to apply to a wide variety of data sets, including electricity bills, street addresses, stock prices, population numbers, death rates, lengths of rivers, physical and mathematical constants, and processes described by power laws (which are very common in nature). It tends to be most accurate when values are distributed across multiple orders of magnitude.


The graph (below) shows Benford's law for base 10. There is a generalization of the law to numbers expressed in other bases (for example, base 16), and also a generalization to second digits and later digits.
It is named after physicist Frank Benford, who stated it in 1938, although it had been previously stated by Simon Newcomb in 1881.
__________________
Keep Your Bodies Off My Lawn

SteveDallas's Random Thread Picker.
HungLikeJesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 06:52 PM   #3
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
[quote=HungLikeJesus;780792]Benford's Law
From Wikipedia:

Quote:
This counter-intuitive result has been found to apply to a wide variety of data sets, including electricity bills, street addresses, stock prices, population numbers, death rates, lengths of rivers, physical and mathematical constants, and processes described by power laws (which are very common in nature). It tends to be most accurate when values are distributed across multiple orders of magnitude.
OK, pls explain to me why this is "counter-intuitive ?
and, what difference would it make if it was distributed across orders of magnitude.

If I am going to count anything, I start with "1". Therefore in a set of any size,
there will always be a larger number of "1's" than of "2's" than of "3's"...etc.
And to point out the obvious, in small sets, there may not even be a "9" or "0"

In the examples of the quote above,
a small town might have street addresses of 100's, 200's... to 700's, but no 800's or 900's. etc.

I guess I'm not getting Benford's idea of the whole thing.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2012, 02:04 PM   #4
HungLikeJesus
Only looks like a disaster tourist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: above 7,000 feet
Posts: 7,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by HungLikeJesus View Post
Benford's Law
From Wikipedia:

Hey, I just noticed that they left off consideration of the digit 0 (and the digit þ)
__________________
Keep Your Bodies Off My Lawn

SteveDallas's Random Thread Picker.
HungLikeJesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2012, 02:20 PM   #5
Pete Zicato
Turns out my CRS is a symptom of TMB.
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 2,916
Here they are HLJ!

Half of all people are below average.

Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
__________________


Talk nerdy to me.
Pete Zicato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2012, 07:59 PM   #6
ZenGum
Doctor Wtf
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by HungLikeJesus View Post
Hey, I just noticed that they left off consideration of the digit 0 (and the digit þ)
No number starts with a zero.

Or else they all do. 0001, 002, etc. We take the first significant figure.

What about 0.005, you ask?

5 x 10^-3
__________________
Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008.
Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl.
ZenGum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 08:31 PM   #7
BigV
Goon Squad Leader
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 27,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenGum View Post
No number starts with a zero.

Or else they all do. 0001, 002, etc. We take the first significant figure.

What about 0.005, you ask?

5 x 10^-3
orly? What about the product of

5 x 0 = ?
__________________
Be Just and Fear Not.
BigV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2012, 11:35 PM   #8
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenGum View Post
No number starts with a zero.
In computers, all positive numbers start with zero. Negative numbers start with one.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 11:59 AM   #9
Sundae
polaroid of perfection
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 24,185
Sod's Law.
It's like ten thousand spoons, when all you need is a knife.
__________________
Life's hard you know, so strike a pose on a Cadillac
Sundae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 12:07 PM   #10
infinite monkey
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,002
Hahhahaahaa...brother just sent me this today.
Attached Images
 
infinite monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 12:17 PM   #11
Sundae
polaroid of perfection
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 24,185
Synchronicity!
It must mean something.

Probably being deluged by spoons.
__________________
Life's hard you know, so strike a pose on a Cadillac
Sundae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2012, 08:39 PM   #12
toranokaze
I'm still a jerk
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Little Mexico
Posts: 1,817
A woman who writes a song called irony, but has no concept of the word; now that is ironic.
__________________
"Without deviation from the norm progress is not possible." - Frank Zappa

It is the ignorance of ignorance that lead to the death of knowledge

The Virgin Mary does not weep for her son, for he is in paradise. She weeps for the world , for we are in suffering.
toranokaze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 12:38 PM   #13
HungLikeJesus
Only looks like a disaster tourist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: above 7,000 feet
Posts: 7,208
Pareto principle
From Wikipedia:

Quote:
The Pareto principle (also known as the 80–20 rule, the law of the vital few, and the principle of factor sparsity) states that, for many events, roughly 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes.

Business-management consultant Joseph M. Juran suggested the principle and named it after Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto, who observed in 1906 that 80% of the land in Italy was owned by 20% of the population; he developed the principle by observing that 20% of the pea pods in his garden contained 80% of the peas.

It is a common rule of thumb in business; e.g., "80% of your sales come from 20% of your clients". Mathematically, where something is shared among a sufficiently large set of participants, there must be a number k between 50 and 100 such that "k% is taken by (100 − k)% of the participants". The number k may vary from 50 (in the case of equal distribution, i.e. 100% of the population have equal shares) to nearly 100 (when a tiny number of participants account for almost all of the resource). There is nothing special about the number 80% mathematically, but many real systems have k somewhere around this region of intermediate imbalance in distribution.
Quote:
Due to the scale-invariant nature of the power law relationship, the relationship applies also to subsets of the income range. Even if we take the ten wealthiest individuals in the world, we see that the top three (Warren Buffett, Carlos Slim Helú, and Bill Gates) own as much as the next seven put together.
...
In the systems science discipline, Epstein and Axtell created an agent-based simulation model called SugarScape, from a decentralized modeling approach, based on individual behavior rules defined for each agent in the economy. Wealth distribution and Pareto's 80/20 Principle became emergent in their results, which suggests that the principle is a natural phenomenon.

In health care in the United States, it has been found that 20% of patients use 80% of health care resources.

Several criminology studies have found that 80% of crimes are committed by 20% of criminals.
__________________
Keep Your Bodies Off My Lawn

SteveDallas's Random Thread Picker.
HungLikeJesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2011, 05:53 PM   #14
ZenGum
Doctor Wtf
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
85% of ....

You know the rest.
__________________
Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008.
Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl.
ZenGum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2011, 02:43 PM   #15
HungLikeJesus
Only looks like a disaster tourist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: above 7,000 feet
Posts: 7,208
As a real-world example, Lamp, let's say that we looked at the number of views for threads in one Cellar forum - Nothingland, for example. Would you expect the first digit to have a uniform distribution, or would you expect it to follow the distribution indicated by Benford's Law?
__________________
Keep Your Bodies Off My Lawn

SteveDallas's Random Thread Picker.
HungLikeJesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.