|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-26-2005, 07:48 AM | #1 |
High Propagandist
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 111
|
Cutting through Inaugural rhetoric
Today in Pat Buchanan's WorldNet daily article he cuts through one of the biggest inconsistencies of the new and improved Bush doctrine as stated in his inaugural address of 1/20/2005, saying:
"President Bush is championing a policy of interventionism in the internal affairs of every nation on earth. But did we not learn from 9-11 that intervention is not a cure for terrorism, it is the cause of terrorism. Clearly, the president does not understand this, or believe it. For, in his inaugural, he describes 9-11 as the day "when freedom came under attack." But Osama bin Laden did not dispatch his fanatics to ram planes into the World Trade Center because he hated our Bill of Rights. He did it because he hates our presence and our policies in the Middle East." This is a telling observation, one with which I agree. Bush's intnent has a far greater reach than say, Woodrow Wilson. Buchanan ends the article aptly noting that such a policy will end only in dissillusionment and grief for the people of the United States. -Walrus Article can be found at: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42557 |
01-26-2005, 08:34 AM | #2 |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
The Republican Party has fallen a long way when Pat Buchanan is the one sounding reasonable.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
01-26-2005, 11:29 AM | #3 |
a real smartass
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,121
|
Pat Buchanan has been a contributor to antiwar.com for over a year, and he's held these opinions for some time. However, he still voted for Bush.
|
01-26-2005, 11:50 AM | #4 |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
I know. It's the rest of the party that has gotten worse, Buchannan has remained where he always was.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
01-26-2005, 12:08 PM | #5 |
The urban Jane Goodall
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,012
|
You could almost believe that he has classic liberal leanings.
__________________
I have gained this from philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law. - Aristotle |
01-26-2005, 02:18 PM | #6 |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
Add Ron Paul (R-TX) to the list of liberal-leaning Republicans.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
01-26-2005, 03:28 PM | #7 |
High Propagandist
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 111
|
It's amazing what stands as liberal leaning now
When one thinks about it, in many ways, some classic conservatives would be considered liberal today. Two great cases are Dick Nixon and Barry Goldwater. The glaring example from Goldwater's idealogy is the concept of not invading people's homes with what the government thinks, period. Before his fairly recent death, he was not pleased with the Christian right's attempt to intrude on the lives of citizens through gestures to Bush, he believed in no overt government intrusion in the personal lives of citizens. With Dick Nixon, there's a number of examples, but one striking one, one that made him many enemies, is detente, and his backdoor shuttle diplomacy. There's no way people on the JCS, defense contractors, and the military-industrial complex would ever want detente with the Russians, especially then.
-Walrus |
01-26-2005, 04:17 PM | #8 |
Professor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,788
|
You only learn that interventionism is a cause for terrorism if you take some of Osama bin Laden's proclamations at face value.
Perhaps Osama would have preferred if the US had failed to intervene in Afghanistan.... when the USSR held it. |
01-26-2005, 08:45 PM | #9 |
a real smartass
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,121
|
http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/link...brzezinski.htm
According to Carter's NSA advisor (trying to take credit for the collapse of the Soviet Union), the United States began stirring up the mujahideen several months before the Soviet invasion, in an attempt to give the Soviets a Vietnam of their own. |
01-27-2005, 06:06 AM | #10 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
Pretty damning of the Carter administration. eh? Is the interview real?
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
01-27-2005, 07:45 AM | #11 | ||
a real smartass
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,121
|
The article with Le Nouvel Observateur is said to be confirmed by material from the Carter-Brezhnev Project's archives, and:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Torrere; 01-27-2005 at 07:48 AM. |
||
01-27-2005, 09:01 AM | #12 |
Radical Centrist
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
|
So you guys are big fans of the USSR?
|
01-27-2005, 11:00 AM | #14 | |
Professor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,788
|
Quote:
|
|
01-27-2005, 04:27 PM | #15 |
I think this line's mostly filler.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
|
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy during 1981-82, Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review? Liberal-leaning.
__________________
_________________ |...............| We live in the nick of times. | Len 17, Wid 3 | |_______________| [pics] |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|