The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-25-2004, 11:15 AM   #1
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
The Way I Figure It

I've changed my mind on the draft question. I thought that reinstituting the draft was a non-starter, but I've been listening to Kerry and the bottom line is he will have to have a draft to do Iraq his way. Bush is playing things closer to his vest, pretending we can win Iraq with our present committment. So now I'm thinking that Kerry=LBJ and Bush=nutball. Every election I question whether I should vote at all because it lends credibility to government to have folks show up. The last thing these two guys need is credibility.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2004, 11:35 AM   #2
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
On the other hand, Kerry is explicitly saying that he will not reinstitute the draft, and Bush is not.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2004, 12:19 PM   #3
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0040907-6.html

Quote:
Q Mr. President, if the war on terrorism continues, do you feel that there will be a need for the draft? And do you want to start the draft again?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, first of all, the war on terror will continue. It's going to take awhile. And, no, we don't need a draft. What we need to do is -- don't worry about it. What we need to do is to make sure our troops are well-paid, and well-housed, and well-equipped. (Applause.)

And that's why -- and that's why over the last three-and-a-half years we've increased military pay by 21 percent. And that's why our housing is better. (Applause.) We've improved housing. You see, you keep a soldier in the military by appealing to his family or her family. When the housing is good, when the health is good, they stay. When the pay is decent, they stay.

And so, therefore, in making a volunteer army work, it's best to treat our soldiers with the best we possibly can. And we made great progress in doing just that. No, I'm -- we don't need the draft. We don't need a draft at all.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2004, 12:54 PM   #4
busterb
NSABFD
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MS. usa
Posts: 3,908
Yea right when the NG troops all bail out. Then what?
__________________
I've haven't left very deep footprints in the sands of time. But, boy I've left a bunch.
busterb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2004, 02:41 PM   #5
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
make sure our troops are well-paid, and well-housed, and well-equipped
I metioned in TW's thread, the Marine I've been writing to in Fallujah, came home. After a two day convoy to Kuwait and 22 air hours to Camp Pendleton, they were told where to bed down. You've got brand new beds, men!
The trouble is the new beds were still unassembled in boxes. Gives a whole new meaning to "make your bed".

I doubt the draft is coming back,.......until they need it.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2004, 09:56 PM   #6
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bush
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0040907-6.html
And, no, we don't need (present tense) a draft. ... No, I'm -- we don't need (present tense) the draft. We don't need (present tense) a draft at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edwards
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040915/D854BH0O1.html
There will be (future tense) no draft when John Kerry is president.
At this point, unless you count forced enlistment extensions, we don't need a draft. That's all he said, and then went into a memorized tangential point.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2004, 11:07 PM   #7
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
*shrug* If you want to put it that way, Kerry has failed to address future Bible restrictions in West Virginia. It's just semantics.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2004, 11:21 PM   #8
Kitsune
still eats dirt
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,031
Is a draft needed for Iraq? With a loss of "only" 1,000 troops over the course of the war, no. This is no where near as bad a vietnam.

Throw in Iran/Syria/North Korea, however, and it will be a completely different story.
Kitsune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2004, 11:31 PM   #9
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
That's 1,000 dead, don't forget the wounded and even more, disgusted. But, we've still got a ton of soldiers in Europe, don't we?
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2004, 03:56 AM   #10
marichiko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
BTW, housing sucks - ever lived in a barracks? Medical care for dependents has gone down the shithole, the comissary prices on food are now equivalent to what you'd pay at Walmart, and the PX prices stateside are no special bargain, either. Cigarettes were still prety cheap last time I checked, so I guess you can always smoke yourself to death if the enemy doesn't get you first. Base pay for E1's and E2's, regular military on active duty (the guys who get to be cannon fodder) ranges from aprox $14,000 to $16,000/year. As usual, Bush didn't have the faintest idea of what he was talking about in the citation listed above. Will we need a draft if things continue to heat up? You tell me.

Last edited by marichiko; 09-26-2004 at 04:16 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2004, 07:37 AM   #11
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
*shrug* If you want to put it that way, Kerry has failed to address future Bible restrictions in West Virginia. It's just semantics.
Perhaps. But Kerry hasn't been asked "Will you ban the Bible?" and answered "We don't need to. I've supported churches before."
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2004, 08:02 AM   #12
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
Come on, it's just semantics, HM. And it's a flat-out loser, because the actual proposal for a draft was presented and supported by the house Democrats. Rangel blew it for the party and I bet he is unrepentant.
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2004, 09:12 AM   #13
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
Every election I question whether I should vote at all because it lends credibility to government to have folks show up. The last thing these two guys need is credibility.
Credibility? We don't need no stinking credibitity! We got the authority. We got the police & military. We got God. We got your money.
Screw credibility, we only worry about votes for the other guy, but Diabold is working on that.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2004, 09:33 AM   #14
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Political speech is semantics. If a politician doesn't say yes or no to a yes or no question, then you have to parse it to figure out exactly what they said.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2004, 09:40 AM   #15
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Yes, but some yes or no questions are a trap and require further clarification.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.