Will the real Sharon stand up? or do we believe the myths

[tw]

His early carrer was a great military mind with stunning successes such as the capture of the Milta(?) Pass. However in 1973, as a Major General, he retired. In response to Isreal's surprise attack in 1967 and with almost 6 months of constant warning that war would restart if Isreal refused to negotiate - Arabs attacked Isreal in Oct 1973. Since no one believed Sadat's repeated warnings of war, then it was called a surprise attack.

Sharon returned to active duty to rally a stunning counter attack in the Sinai. With front lines returned to a Suez Canal border, all parties agreed to a cease fire, including the US, USSR, Israeli and Egyptian governments. This was UN Resolution 338 - that repeated demands for UN resolution 242 (some posters will be quick to forget those numbers because 242 is the foundation of a fair and equitable peace settlement. The world continues to demand 242 as a Middle East settlement).

The enemy of all humans continued his murderous ways by openly disobeying cease fire orders. Instead the devil crosses Suez during the cease fire and continued operations against the Egyptian Third Army for 3(?) days.

Sharon did so knowing full well that this would lead to a US/USSR confrontation with possible nuclear consequences. But his is a 'fuck them all' mentality - words to define the most evil of men. Many readers here would not exist if Sharon had obtained his ultimate goal. He regarded nuclear war as one way to cutoff his enemy's supplies - he disrepects human life that greatly. He believed a nuclear exchange would only benefit his ambitions. He thought as Gen Curtis Lemay (Cuban Missile Crisis) did when LeMay openly said that we were already at war with the Russian - everyone else did not know it. LeMay also did everything he could to create the final solution - a nuclear war. (LeMay ordered some 200 American aircraft to their death in an attempt to heat up nuclear war.)

Even after the Begin / Sadat treaty, Sharon was talking of ways to win a final battle against Egypt. He still considered Egypt as an enemy. Sharon ignored the consequences when he knowingly crossed the Suez Canal, against all orders, and in direct violation of UN resolution 338. Every reader's life was affected by his action - even if you were born after 1973.

USSR troops and transports massed in Bulgaria and Romania to enforce the UN 338 cease fire. Nixon refused to join or to endorse a UN ceasefire army. It is the only time in history that a US President ordered DEFCOM 2 - the next step would be a nuclear attack by the US on USSR, China, and Eastern Europe. B-52s sat fully manned either airborne or on the tramac - never happened even in the Cuban Missile Crisis. The USS America, in Athens, was sneaked out of port to attack Russian transports over the Med or to attack Russian bases. There is reason to believe that a Libyan submarine was attacked and sunk by the US Navy. Yes - all this because a scum bag, racist was only interested in his own glory and self serving objective.

As a direct result, OPEC raised gasoline prices to well over $3.00 (in 1999 dollars), as promised, because of the October War and, in particular, because of Sharon's insubordinations. This caused the first of two world wide 1970s energy crisis.

Does he stop there? No, not this Hitler type. Instead he joins in creating a new political party - Likud. As Defense Minister in 1982, he invades Lebanon which resulted in the destruction of that country's government and a disasterous Lebanon civil war - thousands would die uselessly because Sharon saw another oppurtunity to murder those he viewed as enemies. Isreal would be trapped in that Lebanon morass for 18 years - directly traceable only to Sharon's actions.

Sharon openly lied to Israel's Prime Minister during the entire Lebanon invasion - so what else is new? Furthermore he trapped innocent refugees using his Isreali troops, then permitted Christain Lebanese to massacre those Palestinians - mostly women and children. This massacre was created on orders issued by Sharon. The only thing he did not do was order Christians in for the killing - Sharon just held the door. 'Held the door' is a famous statement used to describe what Sharon did.

Isreal's conservative Prime Minister was so upset that he demanded Sharon's resignation and swore that Sharon would never serve the military again. In one way, the PM was correct.

Anywhere else, a person like Sharon would be subject to an international war crimes tribunal. Is that not what evil men did in Serbia, Kosovo, Croatia, Bosnia, Slovakia, East Timor, Rwanda & Bruendi, and Iraq? Yes, but Sharon, the mother raper, has protection among many who ignore reality - even in the US. He could engineer a great massacre, put another country into civil war, act no different from Pol Pot of Cambodia (Killing Fields); yet some Cellar members still condone his actions? Go figure. Sharon is remembered not for his murders but lovingly for his 1973 insubordination. To not called him Anus-face is to endorse his genocide.

But Sharon was not done. Peres and Rabin negotiated the foundations for peaceful settlement with Arafat. Sharon openly advocated actions that would later be defined as the Rabin assinination. Sharon's early words were ignored because many falsely believed that no Isreali would kill another Israeli. Again, they underestimated a man that smells as shit and reeks of evil. Today we know that Sharon's, et al words were the impetus for Rabin's murder. But still some forget that part.

Who are Sharon's advisers? From The Economist of 3 Feb 2001:
"" ... Mr Sharon would form a narrower coalition with those same extremists. Two or three of them are scary. The "crazies", as non-crazy Israelis call them, include Avigdor Lieberman ... who has talked to East European ambassadors about bombing Tehran and/or Egypt's Aswam Dam, and Rehavam Ze'eiv, an ethnic cleanser, who has talked of cutting the Palestinians off from water and electricity, and depriving Israel's own Arab citizens of their vote.""

The Economist, a responsible news magazine, boldly and distinctly describe Sharon and his allies. Sharon's allies in the US would have you forget all that. The Economist only labels the worst of people as 'crazy'. It is a shame that Sharon's allies in the Cellar conveniently even forget a Lebanon massacre created by this KKK like fanatic - Ariel Sharon. If only he would clean up the world by putting a sheet over his ugly, hate-promoting face. Instead he associates with ethnic cleansing - and we stay quiet? Why?

If Sharon and his friends were Americans, they would be called David Duke and armed religious zealots. But because they are Israeli, some in the Cellar would all but praise these cunt heads. Go figure. These same men promote themselves using campaign slogans like "Sharon and Shalom". Right. Sounds similar to 1930 Nazis slogans. Say one thing but mean another.

Again, some Americans conveniently forget who created the current intifada. It was a stroke of genius that would attack both enemies - all Arabs (Isreali and Palestinians), AND make Barak's Labor government unstable. Furthermore, that dick face, father fucker, Sharon has some Cellar dwellers preaching his lies. You read it here in another discussion area (Man vs Tank) where another blames Palenstinian parents for ordering their kids into the intifada. Brain washing can occur even in America when they only hear what they want to hear - the truth be damned.

Adam - you have openly lied to all Cellar members and have supported a man guilty of great evil. He almost got the entire world into a nuclear war - but you don't care. He openly massacred innocent peoples - but you don't care. He is routinely insubordinate to his superiors, AND he has you openly lying to others - you should care. Shame on you, Adam, for all but praising Hitler - as ironic as that would be. You apologies to the world should begin by recognizing what honest and decent people advocate throughout the world - UN Resolution 242. Who are the enemies of internationally recognized principals such as UN 242? Ariel Sharon and anyone else who does not comdem this genocidal murder.

To praise Ariel Sharon is to spit on the grave of Rabin. To not condemn Ariel Sharon is to spit on the grave of Yitzhak Rabin. How can a country of great leaders such as Shimon Peres and Golda Mier let such trash exist in the same government offices! If Sharon can advocate the murder of a great Isreali Prime Minister, then the murder of Sharon is acceptable. However Sharon's murder would only make things worse. If more responsible people labeled Sharon properly (as I have), then Sharon would become insignificant. The only reason for this long post - some are so nieve as to think Ariel Sharon is a nice human. But then what can you expect from a man who shared the philosophies of petty theif Netanyahu.

What do you call a man who, almost single handedly, destroyed peace? In Yugoslavia, he was called Slobodan Milosevic. Elected by people who also refused to see the facts and with the same blind support in America. Thousands had to die uselessly before the living would see the devil - even though facts were obvious. In Israel, same will happen. Not enough Israelis are dying yet. There is little difference between Milosevic, Ariel Sharon, and the devil. That will change once death totals increase. Only then will some Americans suddenly discover the above posted history.

Of course I have been wrong. I also thought O J Simpson was guilty.