9th Circuit Court strikes again.

lookout123 · 10-05-2004, 05:51 PM

This isn't technically about politics, but it is definitely about the idea of being politically correct so this is where the thread shall land.

Disclaimer: i haven't researched the organization that published this or the individuals in the suit yet. i post this for consumption in the cellar.

9th Circuit Court

i don't personally see how a court can rule that private property cannot be used in this manner because it holds a "cultural significance" to a group of people. the significance it holds is that it is sacred land in their belief system. at the sam time thecourt rules to remove a cross from a memorial area, so as not to conflict with the establishment clause.

how is one acceptable and the other not?

10-05-2004, 05:51 PM	#1
lookout123 changed his status to single Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Right behind you. No, the other side. Posts: 10,308	9th Circuit Court strikes again. This isn't technically about politics, but it is definitely about the idea of being politically correct so this is where the thread shall land. Disclaimer: i haven't researched the organization that published this or the individuals in the suit yet. i post this for consumption in the cellar. 9th Circuit Court i don't personally see how a court can rule that private property cannot be used in this manner because it holds a "cultural significance" to a group of people. the significance it holds is that it is sacred land in their belief system. at the sam time thecourt rules to remove a cross from a memorial area, so as not to conflict with the establishment clause. how is one acceptable and the other not? __________________ Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)