Religion, Law, and Politics

[TheMercenary]

Scandal puts spotlight on Christian law school
Grads influential in Justice Dept.
By Charlie Savage, Globe Staff | April 8, 2007

VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. -- The title of the course was Constitutional Law, but the subject
was sin. Before any casebooks were opened, a student led his classmates in a 10-minute
devotional talk, completed with "amens," about the need to preserve their
Christian values.
"Sin is so appealing because it's easy and because it's fun,"
the law student warned.
Regent University School of Law, founded by televangelist Pat Robertson to provide
"Christian leadership to change the world," has worked hard in its two-decade
history to upgrade its reputation, fighting past years when a majority of its graduates
couldn't pass the bar exam and leading up to recent victories over Ivy League
teams in national law student competitions.
But even in its darker days, Regent has had no better friend than the Bush administration.
Graduates of the law school have been among the most influential of the more than
150 Regent University alumni hired to federal government positions since President
Bush took office in 2001, according to a university website.
One of those graduates is Monica Goodling , the former top aide to Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales who is at the center of the storm over the firing of US attorneys.
Goodling, who resigned on Friday, has become the face of Regent overnight -- and
drawn a harsh spotlight to the administration's hiring of officials educated
at smaller, conservative schools with sometimes marginal academic reputations.
Documents show that Goodling, who has asserted her Fifth Amendment right against
self-incrimination to avoid testifying before Congress, was one of a handful of
officials overseeing the firings. She helped install Timothy Griffin , the Karl
Rove aide and her former boss at the Republican National Committee, as a replacement
US attorney in Arkansas.
Because Goodling graduated from Regent in 1999 and has scant prosecutorial experience,
her qualifications to evaluate the performance of US attorneys have come under fire.
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, asked at a hearing: "Should
we be concerned with the experience level of the people who are making these highly
significant decisions?"
And across the political blogosphere, critics have held up Goodling, who declined
to be interviewed, as a prime example of the Bush administration subordinating ability
to politics in hiring decisions.
"It used to be that high-level DOJ jobs were generally reserved for the best
of the legal profession," wrote a contributor to The New Republic website .
". . . That a recent graduate of one of the very worst (and sketchiest) law
schools with virtually no relevant experience could ascend to this position is a
sure sign that there is something seriously wrong at the DOJ."
The Regent law school was founded in 1986, when Oral Roberts University shut down
its ailing law school and sent its library to Robertson's Bible-based college
in Virginia. It was initially called "CBN University School of Law" after
the televangelist's Christian Broadcasting Network, whose studios share the
campus and which provided much of the funding for the law school. (The Coors Foundation
is also a donor to the university.) The American Bar Association accredited Regent
's law school in 1996.
Not long ago, it was rare for Regent graduates to join the federal government. But
in 2001, the Bush administration picked the dean of Regent's government school,
Kay Coles James , to be the director of the Office of Personnel Management -- essentially
the head of human resources for the executive branch. The doors of opportunity for
government jobs were thrown open to Regent alumni.
"We've had great placement," said Jay Sekulow , who heads a non profit
law firm based at Regent that files lawsuits aimed at lowering barriers between
church and state. "We've had a lot of people in key positions."
Many of those who have Regent law degrees, including Goodling, joined the Department
of Justice. Their path to employment was further eased in late 2002, when John Ashcroft
, then attorney general, changed longstanding rules for hiring lawyers to fill vacancies
in the career ranks.
Previously, veteran civil servants screened applicants and recommended whom to hire,
usually picking top students from elite schools.
In a recent Regent law school newsletter, a 2004 graduate described being interviewed
for a job as a trial attorney at the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division
in October 2003. Asked to name the Supreme Court decision from the past 20 years
with which he most disagreed, he cited Lawrence v. Texas, the ruling striking down
a law against sodomy because it violated gay people's civil rights.
"When one of the interviewers agreed and said that decision in Lawrence was
'maddening,' I knew I correctly answered the question," wrote the Regent
graduate . The administration hired him for the Civil Rights Division's housing
section -- the only employment offer he received after graduation, he said.
The graduate from Regent -- which is ranked a "tier four" school by US
News & World Report, the lowest score and essentially a tie for 136th place
-- was not the only lawyer with modest credentials to be hired by the Civil Rights
Division after the administration imposed greater political control over career
hiring.
The changes resulted in a sometimes dramatic alteration to the profile of new hires
beginning in 2003, as the Globe reported last year after obtaining resumes from
2001-2006 to three sections in the civil rights division. Conservative credentials
rose, while prior experience in civil rights law and the average ranking of the
law school attended by the applicant dropped.
As the dean of a lower-ranked law school that benefited from the Bush administration's
hiring practices, Jeffrey Brauch of Regent made no apologies in a recent interview
for training students to understand what the law is today, and also to understand
how legal rules should be changed to better reflect "eternal principles of
justice," from divorce laws to abortion rights.
"We anticipate that many of our graduates are going to go and be change agents
in society," Brauch said.
Still, Brauch said, the recent criticism of the law school triggered by Goodling's
involvement in the US attorney firings has missed the mark in one respect: the quality
of the lawyers now being turned out by the school, he argued, is far better than
its image.
Seven years ago, 60 percent of the class of 1999 -- Goodling's class -- failed
the bar exam on the first attempt. (Goodling's performance was not available,
though she is admitted to the bar in Virginia.) The dismal numbers prompted the
school to overhaul its curriculum and tighten admissions standards.
It has also spent more heavily to recruit better-qualified law students. This year,
it will spend $2.8 million on scholarships, a million more than what it was spending
four years ago.
The makeover is working. The bar exam passage rate of Regent alumni , according
to the Princeton Review, rose to 67 percent last year. Brauch said it is now up
to 71 percent, and that half of the students admitted in the late 1990s would not
be accepted today. The school has also recently won moot-court and negotiation competitions,
beating out teams from top-ranked law schools.
Adding to Regent's prominence, its course on "Human Rights, Civil Liberties,
and National Security" is co taught by one of its newest professors: Ashcroft.
Even a prominent critic of the school's mission of integrating the Bible with
public policy vouches for Regent's improvements. Barry Lynn , the head of the
liberal Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, said Regent is
churning out an increasingly well-trained legal army for the conservative Christian
movement.
"You can't underestimate the quality of a lot of the people that are there,"
said Lynn, who has guest-lectured at Regent and debated professors on its campus.
In light of Regent's rapid evolution, some current law students say it is frustrating
to be judged in light of Regent alumni from the school's more troubled era --
including Goodling.
One third-year student, Chamie Riley , said she rejected the idea that any government
official who invokes her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination could
be a good representative of Regent.
As Christians, she said, Regent students know "you should be morally upright.
You should not be in a situation where you have to plead the Fifth."

[xoxoxoBruce]

Robertson & co work cheap, only 150 jobs in return for the presidency. Bush never showed much promise as a businessman, so somebody else must of struck that deal.... could it be... SATAN!

Oh, but we need not worry about religion... just leave it alone.
NOT!
Dominionism and reconstructionism are real and moderates are enablers just by their existence and numbers.
The complete separation of church and state is reasonable and just.
Religion in our courts and law is not, in any way.