The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-2007, 06:41 PM   #1
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Pentagon won't back official who blasted Gitmo lawyers (yeah... right)

You know this guy was sent to say this with the slap on the wrist planned for after. Notice no mention of any real punishment.

Quote:
Pentagon won't back official who blasted Gitmo lawyers

POSTED: 2251 GMT (0651 HKT), January 13, 2007
Story Highlights
• Deputy assistant secretary of defense suggested boycott of detainees' lawyers
• Pentagon spokesman says official was not speaking for Bush administration
• Official said law firms should explain who is paying them to represent "terrorists"
• Critics call remarks intimidation, "shameful and irresponsible"

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Pentagon on Saturday disavowed a senior official's remarks suggesting companies boycott law firms that represent detainees at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Charles "Cully" Stimson, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for detainee affairs, said in a radio interview last week that companies might want to consider taking their business to firms that do not represent suspected terrorists.

Stimson's remarks were viewed by legal experts and advocacy groups as an attempt to intimidate law firms that provide legal help to all people, even unpopular defendants.

A Pentagon spokesman, Lt. Col. Brian Maka, said Stimson was not speaking for the Bush administration.

Stimson's comments "do not represent the views of the Department of Defense or the thinking of its leadership," Maka told The Associated Press on Saturday.

Stimson's "shameful and irresponsible" remarks deserve condemnation, said Neal Sonnett, a Miami lawyer and president of the American Judicature Society, a nonpartisan group of judges, lawyers and others.

Sonnett said in a statement that Stimson had made a "blatant attempt to intimidate lawyers and their firms who are rendering important public service in upholding the rule of law and our democratic ideals."

Stimson on Thursday told Federal News Radio, a local commercial station that covers the government, that he found it "shocking" that lawyers at many of the nation's top law firms represent detainees.

Stimson listed the names of more than a dozen major firms he suggested should be boycotted.

"And I think, quite honestly, when corporate CEOs see that those firms are representing the very terrorists who hit their bottom line back in 2001, those CEOs are going to make those law firms choose between representing terrorists or representing reputable firms," Stimson said.

Asked who might be paying the law firms to represent Guantanamo detainees, Stimson hinted at wrongdoing.

"It's not clear, is it? Some will maintain that they're doing it out of the goodness of their heart -- that they're doing it pro bono, and I suspect they are," he said. "Others are receiving monies from who knows where and I'd be curious to have them explain that."

Stimson also described Guantanamo as "certainly, probably the most transparent and open location in the world" because of visits from more than 2,000 journalists since it opened five years ago. However, journalists are not allowed to talk to detainees on those visits, their photos are censored and their access to the base has at times been shut off entirely.

He discounted international outrage over the detention center as "small little protests around the world" that were "drummed up by Amnesty International" and inflated in importance by liberal news media outlets.

FBI agents have documented more than two dozen incidents of possible mistreatment at Guantanamo. In one, a detainee's head was wrapped in duct tape because he chanted the Quran; in a second, a detainee pulled out his hair after hours in a sweltering room.

In a December court ruling, a federal judge in Washington decried the plight of "some of the unfortunate petitioners who have been detained for many years in the terrible conditions at Guantanamo Bay."

The judge criticized a system in which dozens have been held without charges and cut off from the world for lack of English or knowledge about the law, leaving them no choice but to turn to a fellow prisoner with outside connections for legal help.

Since the detention center opened, the U.S. military has transferred or released about 380 detainees. Some 395 remain in the prison.

Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 08:43 PM   #2
Beestie
-◊|≡·∙■·∙≡|◊-
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Parts unknown.
Posts: 4,081
So when a NASA employee says something you agree with, NASA should not interfere but when a Pentagon employee says something you don't agree with, the Pentagon should have him drawn and quartered.

See my problem?
__________________
Beestie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 09:34 PM   #3
yesman065
Banned - Self Imposed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,847
I don't, Is that like an inside joke?
yesman065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 11:55 PM   #4
rkzenrage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beestie View Post
So when a NASA employee says something you agree with, NASA should not interfere but when a Pentagon employee says something you don't agree with, the Pentagon should have him drawn and quartered.

See my problem?
Yes, you make no sense... it is a serious problem.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.