Quote:
Originally Posted by regular.joe
At the end of the day it must be noted that only,about 3% of 4,000, that's 120 to 3,880; the difference between explicit support of AGW and explicit refutation. This is significant, this isn't a 60/40 split.
|
Here's
one Purple Team player's take on these numbers.
Quote:
The largest endorsement group was categorized as “implicitly endorses AGW without minimizing it.” They provided this example of an implied endorsement:
…carbon sequestration in soil is important for mitigating global climate change.
|
That should never be enough to put an abstract into the largest sector of the 97%, the yellow piece above? It implicitly mentions climate change but not anthropomorphic, and is a pretty weak endorsement. This is supposed to be Cook J's example?
I haven't looked into that much further. Of course Mr. Purple is a player and he wants to play the game too.