Thread: Rice
View Single Post
Old 09-10-2014, 06:29 PM   #25
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Ah, on the standard of proof required for such things - from that report:

Quote:
This is because the new measures being introduced in January 2005 will not overrule case-law precedents, which state that “contact is almost always in the interests of the child”13 and which require a higher standard of proof than the simple balance of probabilities in cases involving “more serious allegations”.14
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote