Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Sarge
Why should this have anything to do with "mocking health issues"? This is simply the right of privately owned businesses to provide benefit packages of their selection.
|
The entire case is not about choice in general as you claim. It is completely about the right of privately owned businesses to impose their religious beliefs on employees benefits. Posting without mentioning the only issue - religion - is beyond absurd.
Nobody said anything about denying social security contributions, restricting safety equipment, providing employee parking, or other benefits based on the employers emotions or whims. Nobody suggested benefits denied due to an employee's race, gender, height, age, or citizenship status. Only discussed is whether they can deny benefits based on the owner's religious beliefs. Not based in anything else. Only based on the owners religious beliefs. Youf post is dishonest if it does not discuss prime issue of this entire case - religion.
How to inspire hatred and dissention? How to worship satan? Let anyone impose their religion on anyone else. Nobody expects a Spanish Inquisition.