|
It hits as Cat 1. Well, this won't affect NOAA's math.
But this doesn't actually prove anything, and is now a retarded game of appealing to everyone's observational bias, as is pretty much the entire debate.
In this case, I sided with NOAA and the IPCC and y'all took issue with them. It's all good, I've taken issue with them before. But is that not science denial, when we do that?
|