Quote:
Originally Posted by Fair&Balanced
Thats how it works in an oppressive state. The person/organization charged has to prove innocence.
In America, we do things differently. If one makes allegations against another person/organization, the burden of proof rests with the one making the charge.
Gafney/Geller/Breitbart have the obligation to offer more than the undocumented court "evidence" or innuendo.
|
Your opinion. I say an organization that has a long and well documented history of the support of terrorism has the burden of proof that they have changed their ways, not the other way around.
Nice try in an attempt to label those who disagree with you as supporting McCarthyism. "That dog won't hunt", Willie "Cigar" Clinton.