Quote:
Originally Posted by henry quirk
*Why?
**Why?
|
Because the first guy to come up with a workable, economic solution dominates their end of the market, and competition is at best desultory.
So you have stand alone BBSs. Some generate revenue, some do not.
Then Facebook comes along. Facebook generates revenue while charging its users nothing at all. (Myspace was an earlier, failed attempt at this) Then they own an entire sector of human behavior, which they analyze and sell to outside interests.
Then MeWe came along, had a better platform, promised to stop the abuses and censorship, but there wasn't enough market share left for them to do much of anything at all...They lacked the financial muscle to compete with Facebook. Nobody on the planet has the financial muscle to compete with Facebook.
This has now been proven to be true, so Facebook does whatever they please, knowing that folks like MeWe will not unseat them in the foreseeable future. You have no realistic choice in the market, as a consumer.
Youtube has the exact same monopoly, for the exact same reasons.
And they're not going to come up with actual solutions to blindly censoring entire topics, because there is no market pressure for them to do so.
There are numerous offline examples of the same problem.
So the market is an aristocracy in fact, and a meritocracy only in theory.