Quote:
|
Traditionally news organizations are usually protected, Wikileaks is not one of those.
|
What defines a news organization? More to the point, once the precedent of howWikileaks (whatever they are) is handled in this situation, how can that be made to NOT apply to news organizations? What is the clear, legal separation?
What about unaffiliated individuals who may see information on the internet and post a link to it somewhere else (such as this message board)? Are we protected from prosecution? Is Undertoad?
This is genuine curiosity on my part--I'm not asking because I think I already know the answer.