Quote:
Originally posted by godwulf
With regard to a possible CIA or military intel connection to the Nick Berg killing, all I know is that I've been roundly attacked on a couple of other boards for even suggesting the possibility; it's amazing to me how defensive and angry some people can become when simply faced with an idea that makes them uncomfortable or challenges their assumptions.
|
You are rightly justified - and basically must consider the possiblity - of why Nick Berg was beheaded. This because all possibilities must be considered.
Take another example from Richard Clarke. Terry Nichols can not make a decent bomb. He goes to Phillippines. Comes back and suddenly his bombs work. Did he get help from Islamic fundamentalist who were also there? Very unlikely. But it too is a conspiracy story we cannot ignore; and yet just cannot advocate.
Would CIA have Berg beheaded to shift attention from their Geneva Convention violations? If true, then we have some very rogue and dangerous elements in the 'sneaky' community. However one need only realize that Gordon Liddys do exist. Just that no facts exist to support the Berg murder had domestic reasons.