Quote:
|
I was pointing out a stylistic feature of the play and the playwrite, you suggested that it may be problematic.
|
Wrong, "The problem with PLAYS is the gritty little details are often not true, which leads the play goers to think they know the true story, when in fact they don't." The same goes for any theatrical production, i.e., movies, tv programs, vingnettes, historical dramas and reenactments. They are ALL, somebodys take on history and the more OPINIONS on the gritty details the more misleading they are. Anything written for entertainment, based on true incidents, except for putting fictional characters in a historical setting, in a way that the setting is background and the characters do not affect the background story, is misleading.
Moore can not be vindicated because he's already proved himself to be a charlatan. It has nothing to do with Bush, as Moore has been around a long time and been tilting since before the first Bush. Sometimes they were dragons but usually windmills. He's an opportunist of the first order. Even opportunists get it right occasionally. Moore less than most. So you can wear your "idiot label" proudly, for as a Moore fan, you've earned it.