[OnyxCougar]

Originally posted by DanaC
Well....mostly I just see a circular path whereby the creationist seeks his evidence primarily from within the bible.

I also see a bunch of attempts to refute what proper scientists have discovered/hypothesised.

I see no serious evidence in favour of creationism that isnt derived from an attempt to refute the scientific work of others.

So a different hypothesis isn't science? Isn't science the creation and testing of different hypothesis?

And what is a "proper" scientist? Are you saying that someone that uses the VERY SAME scientific method to hypothesize creationism is not as good a scientist as one who uses the SAME methos to hypothesize evolution?

What I'm seeing in your replies is close minded refutation without reflection.

Prove those hypotheses use science other than the evolutionists use.