OK, that's the story, now here's what gets me.
An Oprah show featuring explicit discussion is considered "decent" because it "serves a legitimate purpose", while Howard Stern is "indecent".
Is the entertainment of millions NOT a "legitimate purpose"?
If 15 million people enjoy the show, and 3 out of 5 appointed FCC commissioners find it obscene, whose votes actually count in a country founded with the words "We The People"?
|