View Single Post
Old 03-17-2015, 04:36 PM   #11
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Plus, see the wiki page of counterexamples. First, it's a short list, though of course, it is undoubtedly incomplete. Second, it contains multiple references to what the scientific consensus is that they are objecting to, including especially another wiki page specifically listing a large number of statements of consensus on the subject. That page includes this statement:

Quote:
As of 2007, when the American Association of Petroleum Geologists released a revised statement, no scientific body of national or international standing rejected the findings of human-induced effects on climate change.
Of course, that revised statement is somewhat equivocal, but they had been the last holdout (as a group; there are individuals, as mentioned in the first link) who been explicitly denying AGW.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote