OR IS IT? *Da Da Da daaaaa (whodoneit music)*
UG knows that tw responds to facts with facts and doesn't respond with childlike emotions to disparaging remarks. So, UG strategized that he could make a brief factual statement, needing no rationale since tw doesn't contest it, followed by so much rhetoric that tw can't reply with his rationale without appearing to respond emotionally. Genius, sheer genius. All you managed to accomplish in your first sentence was alignment with tw.
|