I had stopped looking at information about the bombings a few weeks ago and until I'd read this article I wasn't aware that there had been any coverup of who'd done it.
A question that comes to mind also is how can a guy who was popularly elected do something that is against 90% of the population's wishes. I understand that anything is possible in politics, but how does such a situation arise in a democratic state?
__________________
I have gained this from philosophy: that I do without being commanded what others do only from fear of the law. - Aristotle
|