[Ibby]

y'know, if a SINGLE republican were to propose a SINGLE major spending cut that didn't disproportionately take away resources for the needy - whose use of those resources stimulates the economy and earns the government money on the taxes on the repeated uses of those dollars, through both Keynesian stimulus and through the sheer fact that when you give needy people money they spend it, and then the people they trade that money too also almost always need to spend it again themselves, and so on, over and over (while the wealthy's spending patterns hardly change when they get an extra handful of percent of cash on hand) - i might believe that "spending cuts" actually means a goddamn thing to wingnuts like you.