[Adak]

Originally Posted by tw

Sadly, those who forget basic science routinely use observation as proof. You were taught in second grade science that observation alone is junk science. Also called lies. To know something means supporting facts with hard numbers. You never provide numbers. Your post classic junk science: subjective claims supported only by your feelings.

Your observations, are not just your feelings. They are factual, but not enough for a full statistical measure, since the sampling size is too small. But they are not subjective, and they are not feelings.

When you have two acquaintances on SSD, (and only know 2 people on SSD), and they're both young and healthy (and in one case, knows a trade that is in demand), it is something not to be ignored.


Drivel about something a politician said 10 years ago, is not relevant today. Not for Obama, and not for Romney.

You never knew that Obamacare was based in Romneycare.

Yes, I did know that, and Romneycare in MA has been a failure, according to Conservatives reporting on it.

You never knew Romneycare was first proposed in the Heritage Foundation. They forget to tell you that. Tea Party and Romney supporters only know what first told. They did not tell you those facts. So you remain in denial.

That was also mentioned on the Conservative talk shows. So, wrong again.

Sadly, your facts are inventions by people, like my father, who so loved to manipulate the most naive. White men with little education. Same technique also proved Saddam had WMDs. Same technique even blamed Saddam for 11 September. Same technique even proved that Pond's has Age Defying creams and Geritol for health. Scams are so easy among those who only believe what they are told. The naive only believe what they are first told. Sadly, even think observation is sufficient to have knowledge.

I've got about 4 years of college, and never believed Bush about Saddam causing 9/11. I remember Ponds and Geritol commercials. So what?

Why do you avoid the question? Why did Romney claim to be more liberal than Kennedy? Because he can lie. The most naive will only believe propaganda. He can lie because you forget or ignore facts. You refuse to answer the question for one simple reason. The powers that be have not yet told you what to think. You are why my father so loved advertising. Even your knowledge is only subjective observation. Fun is to manipulate the most naive (white men with least education) with outright lies. Sadly, even forget what was taught in second grade science. You know what the propaganda machine says to think. And think observation is sufficient to know something.

All politicians, lie - grow up. You're obsessed with this drivel of a comment from years ago.

All politicians change their minds, from time to time. Facts on the ground, change, the will of the people they represent, changes, the wording of laws, and the degree of enforcement, changes.

Any politician who never changes their mind on issues, wouldn't be worth a damn. Their VALUES are important, and shouldn't change much, but their position on issues BETTER change, as the situation changes.

Yes, I see you are obsessed with Romney's comment. And with the adverb "sadly", which is sad, in and of itself. Get help, or get over it.