Quote:
Originally Posted by Flint
snip--
Keep in mind, all I am responding to is the comment that Romney's tax plan is incomprehensible. I don't think it is.
|
I know you're talking, we are all talking about Romney's plan, not Flint's political philosophies.
Romney's tax plan is NOT incomprehensible. Romney's tax plan is arithmetically impossible.
He's said things that taken together are contradictory--they can not all exist at the same time.
A guy walks up to a pretty girl at the club. "You're gorgeous! Let's go back to my place and I'll f*ck your brains out. I promise I'll respect you in the morning. Don't worry, your virginity will remain intact."
Not all can happen.
Romney's promised to reduce tax rates (by 20%).
Romney's promise to eliminate deductions by an equal amount (undefined--vagueness prevents precise calculations, so estimates are used).
Romney's promised to keep proportion of taxes paid by taxpayers in top 5% the same (60%).
Romney's promised to reduce the amount of taxes paid by the middle class ($200,000/year income).
Romney's promised to reduce the deficit (no amount given that I could find).
How can all of these be managed? No one has produced an explanation that provides room for all these promises.
What I take from this is that Romney tells the audience he's in front of the thing they want to hear. Fine, they all do that. But as the audiences change, the main story changes. Also fine, different people can have different high priorities. However, Romney's just the one guy, and if he's elected, he can only do one thing, produce one net result, and when the statements are incompatible, something's going to get broken. What promise will be broken?