|
I just realized, rather annoyingly that I've spelt his name wrong. Doh.
[eta] Yeah, at 17 you'd have been too old for him:P
Not sure I agree with the paedophile label that's floating around in the press, mind you. All the girls appear to have been between 12 and 15. Thus far there's not been any mention of girls who hadn't developed sexually (though still clearly children in any other terms). So, he sounds like a control freak, sexual predator and child abuser, possibly rapist, but not paedo.
Last edited by DanaC; 10-05-2012 at 06:22 PM.
|