|
THIS terrifies me.
A presidential candidate LITERALLY STATING, outright, that they will declare themselves the sole arbiter of constitutional interpretation, make themselves alone the Decider on the powers of the executive? Literally telling the supreme court that, if they don't agree with his interpretation, that he will reject their constitutional authority?
Do we really need to re-hash Marbury v. Madison?
__________________
not really back, you didn't see me, i was never here shhhhhh
|