Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt
I kind of do. I have a problem with the word "should," which is why I compared this question to arguing about angels on the head of a pin.
"Should" implies that there is some sort of obligation. That people have a right to certain physical possessions simply because they were born. And if they are owed these possessions, then they are owed them by somebody or some entity. Who? Who owes them that?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhelm
I imagined, instantly... and with no real thought...that the next question would be something along the lines of....if X is the bare minimum, and we have Y amount of Z (wealth, food, whatever) would you want to make it so Z is evenly distributed to make sure all of us have at least X.
So, my quip was but a quip... and I don't know if that's where spexx's thoughts were leading... I was just predicting kind of... probably wrong.
anyway... stop being a commie.
|
There is the same sort of implied obligation in passages from the Bible, but it doesn't make me a Christian to allude to them
.