Crap. You're right, the analogy does break down, in terms of the wider scope of terrorist operations.
The analogy breaks down even further in that there is no 'higher power' to which either side has recourse. In that respect, we could argue an expanded and more aggressive role for the UN, though I can't see anyone in the US govm't going for that since 'we' don't even think that an International Court should have dominion over us. Analogies are always circumspect for explanations.
However, I still argue that terrorism is an inherently childish reaction to a problem. I.e., since you've wronged me, instead of trying to sit down and talk about it like adults, terrorists lash out in tremendously destructive tantrums.
__________________
Don't Panic
Last edited by headsplice; 01-15-2004 at 04:30 PM.
|