View Single Post
Old 04-28-2011, 09:16 PM   #130
Fair&Balanced
Operations Operative
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
Great, dispute the assumptions. I mean since "every thing you have seen" and a number of major economies have failed at this attempt. Can you ID those countries and exactly how they failed compared to the proposals you have read?

Compare and contrast your observations. Thanks.
There are no industrialized countries with a flat tax, after several EU countries gave it a look, because they found that converting from a progressive tax system to a flat tax redistributes wealth in favor of the top taxpayers and harms the middle class, not only because it is more regressive, but also because it also eliminates deductions that benefit the middle class (mortgage interest, health care costs, pension contributions, etc) and because the reliance on models of economic growth at levels that were unrealistic.

If you feel so strongly about the advantages of a flat tax, you should be able to post one that has been proposed that is not regressive, will not cost the middle class more than they are currently paying in taxes, and does not rely on phantom economic growth projections.

Its a bit disingenuous to say a flat tax is fairer and will better address the debt without demonstrating how that would happen.
Fair&Balanced is offline   Reply With Quote