Quote:
Originally Posted by footfootfoot
Excellent link. It brings up the issue of intent and context. If Monster's son had been taunting a kid whose family had been gunned down the week before, probably not protected. But in the absence of any specific circumstances, just drawing a picture of a gun is hardly impeding the school's mission to teach. While the act of drawing, in itself, may have been disruptive, then that is what the charge should be, not invoking the zero tolerance policy for guns.
yes. their existence was offensive to me. I much preferred
SPOILER ALERT!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Story
SPOILER ALERT!!! |
Hey... fixed that for you. a little late for some of us, but hey.