View Single Post
Old 09-04-2010, 12:05 PM   #5
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
Quote:
My BIL, who is a doctor and my SIL who is an oncology nurse both advise against routine mammography.
Quote:
Eight out of every 1,000 women have breast cancer. Of these 8 women with breast cancer, 7 will have a positive mammogram. Of the remaining 992 women who don’t have breast cancer, some 70 will still have a positive mammogram. Imagine a sample of women who have positive mammograms in screening. How many of these women actually have breast cancer?

OK, but this is a problem with all tests of all kinds.
Every kind of test has some probability of false-positives and false-negatives.
So it is always a matter of RISK vs BENEFIT

BENEFIT of having the mammogram:
Dx leads to treatment and longer survival
(7 women in the example)

RISK of having the mammogram:
First, does the test CAUSE any problems ? (a mammogram = finite, but very low probability)
False Positives cause anxiety/expense until further testing is done
False Negative may lead to early death
(1 woman in example)

RISK of NOT having the mammogram:
High probability of early death due to lack of treatment
(all 8 women in example)

Being male, I can't make the decision.
But for my wife and daughters and G-daughters, a few days of anxiety vs early death:
"No matter how much it hurts, Go get the damn mammogram !"

My wife's reply: OK, but no matter how embarrassing, Go get your damn prostate exam !"
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote