The Cellar - View Single Post

slang · 12-07-2003, 02:50 PM

What about bi-sexuals and try-sexuals*

What if a bi-sexual man is married to a man, but ocassionally wants a little pussy? Is it not out of his control he lusts sexual activities with men and women? Can the man's husband file for divorce if he has sex with a woman? Can a hetero man file for divorce if his wife has sex with another woman? There are some legal cases now being handed down that deal with these issues but they lead to even more questions. Much of the legal thought has to be tested and made consistent. This will take time. Rushing into a whirlwind of court battles is counter productive for the gays, in my opinion.

Are a man's rights being violated because he cannot legally marry a man and a woman at the same time ( a man to work on the car and a woman to keep the house up* )? Can anyone else see this argument being made in the future?

* - Please dont be offended at my attempt to be humorous and leave the forum.

It would go something like this; in this day and age of increasingly longer work schedules and demands for quality time for children, couples and individuals, it is only logical ( and fair ) that more than two people should be allowed to marry. That would decrease the chances of divorce, which we know is a bad influence on the children, by allowing another person to contibute to the "family unit", thus lessening each person's stress. Think about it. If we are going to fiddle with the definition of marriage, doesnt this make sense, to allow more than 2 people to join in this non religious, "civil contract"? Just think of the long term benefits. To decrease divorce and it's ill effects, legally allow the couples to enter the legal contract and have sex with the other "consenting family members" by increasing the potential number from two, to say, three or four. A communal family structure, what could be better? Since the population is having such fertility and financial difficulites nowdays, doesnt this make sense?

You may not imagine people adopting and promoting this idea, but I sure can. If you can alter one major aspect of the definition of marriage, the door is wide open for more. I can see it now, the psychiatric community citing a study of foursomes over a thirty year period and the rosy development of the children in this new "progressive" family structure.

12-07-2003, 02:50 PM	#339
slang St Petersburg, Florida Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 3,423	What about bi-sexuals and try-sexuals* What if a bi-sexual man is married to a man, but ocassionally wants a little pussy? Is it not out of his control he lusts sexual activities with men and women? Can the man's husband file for divorce if he has sex with a woman? Can a hetero man file for divorce if his wife has sex with another woman? There are some legal cases now being handed down that deal with these issues but they lead to even more questions. Much of the legal thought has to be tested and made consistent. This will take time. Rushing into a whirlwind of court battles is counter productive for the gays, in my opinion. Are a man's rights being violated because he cannot legally marry a man and a woman at the same time ( a man to work on the car and a woman to keep the house up* )? Can anyone else see this argument being made in the future? * - Please dont be offended at my attempt to be humorous and leave the forum. It would go something like this; in this day and age of increasingly longer work schedules and demands for quality time for children, couples and individuals, it is only logical ( and fair ) that more than two people should be allowed to marry. That would decrease the chances of divorce, which we know is a bad influence on the children, by allowing another person to contibute to the "family unit", thus lessening each person's stress. Think about it. If we are going to fiddle with the definition of marriage, doesnt this make sense, to allow more than 2 people to join in this non religious, "civil contract"? Just think of the long term benefits. To decrease divorce and it's ill effects, legally allow the couples to enter the legal contract and have sex with the other "consenting family members" by increasing the potential number from two, to say, three or four. A communal family structure, what could be better? Since the population is having such fertility and financial difficulites nowdays, doesnt this make sense? You may not imagine people adopting and promoting this idea, but I sure can. If you can alter one major aspect of the definition of marriage, the door is wide open for more. I can see it now, the psychiatric community citing a study of foursomes over a thirty year period and the rosy development of the children in this new "progressive" family structure. Last edited by slang; 12-07-2003 at 03:02 PM.