Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Monkey
Of course, the term has no legal meaning and is usually assigned by the press, and some people have been called "Czars" who actually have statutory power. But as far as I know, they're confirmed by the Senate, so that complaint doesn't apply.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman
Not necessarily. Many czars are not confirmed by the house nor senate. That was a hot button issue for the GOP last Sept.
As I said, the term is being used moreso as of late to appoint people WITHOUT having to go through the confirmation process.
|
In that paragraph, the second sentence was intended to apply to the first, not to czars in general. I was referring to the ones that have actual power, instead of just being advisors. Do you know of any unconfirmed czars with statutory powers?