Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman
I edited the post and kept only that which I previously had made bold.
Shawnee has been on my ignore list for weeks.
|
Here's what she quoted, that showed you seemed to have understood this better four days ago:
Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman
Kept the obvious parts that were compliant and put "on hold" those that were in question. I like that she didn't rule with an "all-or-nothing" decision.
|
"on hold" is not the end.
Quote:
Basically what you have said is that she made a decision, but not a ruling.
Bruce called it semantics. I agreed.
|
Calling a preliminary injunction and the striking down of a law as unconstitutional semanically equivalent is silly.
Option 1: contested portions of the law can't take effect until both sides have a chance to make their case
Option 2: rule for the plaintiff without hearing the case.
The difference between those options is not semantic.