[Shawnee123]

Originally Posted by classicman

I think the decisions is pretty much what I expected. Its going to get punted upstream anyway.

Kept the obvious parts that were compliant and put "on hold" those that were in question. I like that she didn't rule with an "all-or-nothing" decision.

Originally Posted by classicman

Oh yes. I find it rather ironic that this administration has been saying publicly that they are immigration friendly while the numbers of deportations have increased.
They have done an excellent job of playing both sides of the issue.

Originally Posted by Undertoad

Here Obama does what you want, in bunches, but you guys find ways to casually dismiss it.

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

The judge didn't strike down any part of the law; she said that the most controversial parts couldn't take effect until the case had been decided, which seems pretty reasonable to me.

Originally Posted by classicman

I didn't realize that HM - Now that I think about it thats even worse than striking it down.

Originally Posted by classicman

I admittedly do not know what her "job" was in the situation, but she apparently didn't make a ruling. Instead of ruling for or against, she just sent the issue upstairs.

Originally Posted by classicman

But apparently she did...


Key word being semantics.

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

~snip~ That's the type of situation that preliminary injunctions are for.

Originally Posted by classicman

Bold mine - obviously...

I'm sure it's perfectly normal and common.

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

What are you talking about?

Originally Posted by Shawnee123

What, indeed?