Thread: Gay Marriage
View Single Post
Old 11-26-2003, 03:35 PM   #5
quzah
Knight of the Oval-Shaped Conference Table
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 375
Quote:
Originally posted by ladysycamore
No NOT absurd to some. That's up to you if you don't want to persue that option. If you do, then you do. If not, then oh well. *shrugs*
Ok, so how long is "good enough" for whitey to pay NA? 100 more years? Five more years? 500 more years? 1000 more years? You do realize that "whitey" isn't going to be the majority for long. Oh, wait, they're actually not anyway. They're just considered that because of business percentage or something.

Anyway, back to the topic: Soon, (I've seen it quoted, but 50% of statistics are just made up anyway,) "whitey" will not be a majority. The prediction is that soon there won't be any "white" people. Give it a few more decades. Say 100 years. What then? There are no more "whities", and then should the government still pay the NA? Why?

As long as there is traceable DNA to detect some "whitey" ancestory, should someone be paying the NA? When is the deadline?

But naturally you won't see the point. That's fine.

Quzah.
quzah is offline   Reply With Quote