Hmm. No, I don't think so. Now in Ann Coulter's case, it doesn't seem to hurt. It is clear she considers that the harder edges of governance require a macho mindset and are vitiated to ineffectuality in its absence -- misconceiving the possible as the impossible. That, in effect, boils down to smoothing the way for totalitarian governments to keep right on with their misdeeds and unfreedoms.
Pah. And I've been saying that long before I heard of her.
Returning to my point, Ann Coulter reckons that womanly things, domestic things, are not properly the sphere of central government -- so the Nanny State is right out. She pounds away at this relentlessly, under the surface layer of the crises du jour that keep all columnists and pundits eating regularly, and the rest of us amused or stimulated by their perorations.
Griff, that stretches credulity -- and doesn't exactly pop up in The Neocon Reader either. Leftist totalitarian roots?? Irving Kristol??
__________________
Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.
Last edited by Urbane Guerrilla; 02-03-2010 at 05:41 PM.
|