Quote:
|
They say that their research shows that much of the warming was caused by oceanic cycles when they were in a ‘warm mode’ as opposed to the present ‘cold mode’.
|
Reality from research so disputed that. That same research was the smoking gun that changed the minds of the last remaining experts on the various environmental systems.
That highly respected expert that advocated and defended the Atlantic Oscillatory Cycle completely abandoned his 'holdout' belief once that ‘smoking gun’data arrived a few years ago. He was one of the few holdouts.
Fundamental is data from deep oceans. The trend is now obvious. Oceans have been absorbing heat in tremendous amounts for decades. Eventually, this warmed water will rise back to the surface (large currents that take many decades to cycle). So the question is not global cooling verses global warming. The question is how much faster will global warming occur once these deep ocean currents become warmer and return to the surface.
No responsible scientist believe that political agenda. That nonsense is why White House lawyers had to rewrite science papers. And why most of those 'global warming deniers' are educated by extremist political organization - not science. Curious – the deniers are also many who foolishly believed Saddam had WMDs when those numbers also suggested otherwise.
Reality - the numbers - global warming is a serious man made problem. We just do not know how serious the problem is. But denying it using Rush Limbaugh techniques is what, for example, we can even read in this thread.