Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble
Not everyone has a problem removing the mercury from their body, and not everyone has severe neurological symptoms.
The numbers are evident in the urinary toxic screenings. Other mothers have shared theirs with me. Their kids had no mercury output in their urine (which isn't normal, since as you say it's everywhere around us and should be coming out in equal quantities,)
|
Now you are discussing scientifically. Such studies would be useful, informative, and how one goes about developing a hypothesis. If demonstrated that some human bodies do not detoxify themselves of particular heavy metals, then a useful fact has been provided. I have never heard of this. But then such strange medical exceptions can occur.
Review dystonia. According to medical professionals I discussed this thread with, dystonia can be a reaction by some even to traditionally safe antibiotics. A general rule. There is always someone allergic to something. And many useful, safe, and effective drugs can still even kill some. Does that mean all drugs should be banned? That would be the subjective conclusion.
Meanwhile, are there bodies that cannot remove a particular heavy metal? Some heavy metals are not removed quickly or at all. Do some bodies not remove a particular heavy metal? To know, both the intake and outbreak of those metals must be measured. Only measuring outgoing concentrations is too subjective - if for no other reason because the concentrations may not be detectable at all by that testing standard. Only then may we have a fact from which the next hypothesis might be constructed.
Speculation that some bodies do not detoxify one particular metal is rather interesting.