Quote:
Originally Posted by Clodfobble
You're not even making sense. Do you understand that the "medication" we're discussing here contains mercury?
|
Do you understand that foods you eat, air you breath, and water you drink also contain mercury? You have again done what junk science and political extremists do. Promote a fear subjectively. Not provide numbers.
If mercury in that medication was so destructive, then fluorescent bulbs must be killing people.
Your posts contain subjective reasoning, devoid of the always required numbers, and are based only on statistically insignificant observation. Subjective claims and proof based only in observation are classic symptoms of junk science. The exact same reasoning also proved Saddam had WMDs.
Amazing how many know science intentionally wants to subvert us. Ironically, those who most promote these myths have no science background. Often are educated in religion, politics, English, or other subjective disciplines.
Same reasoning also proved that childhood leukemia was directly traceable to AC electric lines. Once the data was finally provided, that myth (just like an autism myth) was completely debunked.
Do you understand that foods also contain radioactive material? Where is your campaign to eliminate naturally grown foods because radiation is so dangerous? Another example of fears based only in hearsay because numbers and perspective were not provided.
Worse, your every proof is based only subjective observations. Observation alone is a symptom of junk science. But your observation are also subjective – even less reliable. At least the myth about childhood leukemia was based in numbers – before it was discovered to be another junk science conclusion.