The Cellar - View Single Post

Urbane Guerrilla · 05-29-2009, 08:19 PM

And then we have whole books on the topic.

Absolute Power

Now before you say, "Can't be accurate or unbiased, it's got David Limbaugh's name on the cover!" I'll just say, oh, is that so? Were the Clintons not at some pains to cover up their misdeeds? They were. Did those pains actually work for very long? No. Did people uncover the shenanigans? Yes they did. Is a book collecting the findings therefore wrong? You may believe so, but my mind is much more open and critical.

Note, too, the other books often ordered with it on Amazon. Redux is still arguing that where there is smoke there can't be fire. Absurd. This is why I'm neither a leftist nor a Democratic Party guy: too much self-respect.

Did Janet Reno ever have -- let alone pass -- a background check for her AG job, I wonder? There are, I gather, reasons to wonder. And she was not the only one who didn't.

I've passed a couple of background checks myself, both in a Federal capacity, one military, one civilian, both for Top Secret.

Digging into old issues of American Spectator should produce the Sept. 9, 1999 article Janet Reno: Corrupt or Doltish?, L. Brent Bozell. It's no longer online at the magazine's site, but it's available to the historically minded. It is often significant to look at the opposition to find where the establishment character's got her flaws.

Another Law Janet Reno Doesn't Like -- from a law school faculty member. One page, three separate cases of obstructing prosecution. Yep, there's a nasty pattern.

These were not the glory years of the DoJ, or for that Administration.

05-29-2009, 08:19 PM	#177
Urbane Guerrilla Person who doesn't update the user title Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Southern California Posts: 6,674	And then we have whole books on the topic. Absolute Power Now before you say, "Can't be accurate or unbiased, it's got David Limbaugh's name on the cover!" I'll just say, oh, is that so? Were the Clintons not at some pains to cover up their misdeeds? They were. Did those pains actually work for very long? No. Did people uncover the shenanigans? Yes they did. Is a book collecting the findings therefore wrong? You may believe so, but my mind is much more open and critical. Note, too, the other books often ordered with it on Amazon. Redux is still arguing that where there is smoke there can't be fire. Absurd. This is why I'm neither a leftist nor a Democratic Party guy: too much self-respect. Did Janet Reno ever have -- let alone pass -- a background check for her AG job, I wonder? There are, I gather, reasons to wonder. And she was not the only one who didn't. I've passed a couple of background checks myself, both in a Federal capacity, one military, one civilian, both for Top Secret. Digging into old issues of American Spectator should produce the Sept. 9, 1999 article Janet Reno: Corrupt or Doltish?, L. Brent Bozell. It's no longer online at the magazine's site, but it's available to the historically minded. It is often significant to look at the opposition to find where the establishment character's got her flaws. Another Law Janet Reno Doesn't Like -- from a law school faculty member. One page, three separate cases of obstructing prosecution. Yep, there's a nasty pattern. These were not the glory years of the DoJ, or for that Administration. __________________ Wanna stop school shootings? End Gun-Free Zones, of course.