Remember this:
Quote:
|
Both concepts are designed to protect the person who is NOT making 50 katrillion dollars a year and don't have a 40 katrillion nest egg to fall back on: the former by not letting a company getting away with paying a buck fifty an hour, the latter by ensuring that the top pay scales do not jeopardize the viability of the company and therefore protecting the lowest paid employees from paying for the extravagance of the top paid employees who, let's face it, don't really give a shit if the company crumbles...there are more to be had.
|
Your free market society didn't self-regulate very well by the way. Your boys fucked it all up. Sadly, the concept of free market society was conceived with a certain level of belief that people are basically ethical and not evil fucking bastards.
My point again, the purpose of imposing restrictions (jebus h cripes I can't believe I have to go through this again) is to ensure the VIABILITY OF THE COMPANY, SO PANSY ASS GREEDY EXECS DON'T RUN INSTITUTION AFTER INSTITUTION INTO THE GROUND WHILE THE PEOPLE IN THE TRENCHES LOSE JOB AFTER JOB AND PANSY ASS GREEDY EXECS SAIL AWAY ON THEIR YACHT.
Don't give me your argument about "they worked harder they deserve to ruin companies" crap, either. Most of those guys are numnuts.
You really are being obtuse, and you're shit-stirring because you think it's funny and you can't say a damn thing about your point except "Yeah HUH."
You're lucky I like you.
