Quote:
Originally Posted by TGRR
Still don't see any links.
|
Finally got some free time -- been busy with other corners of life.
It is things like this that tell me the Democratic Party and Democratic Administrations in general just don't merit support from with-it people. I'd go so far as to remark that the Dems don't deserve a single partisan until they wise up, win the war, promote gun rights to the point of excommunicating any Democrat who doesn't, and rescind the inflation they are currently legislating into being. Oh, and dump socialism too.
Yet somehow there are still living, breathing human beings who can't get behind all the above. What's up with
that one?
"Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of firearms is the goal." - Janet Reno, December 10, 1993 [Associated Press]
This remark of course brands AG Reno as a supporter, conscious or not, of every description of private crime short of embezzlement and keno games, and of the state crime of genocide – acknowledged by everyone as a crime against humanity. Such a stance is either evil or moronic, and wholly unwise. People who are not corrupt do not take these views, but adopt the wiser way of enthusiasm for private arms, which makes crime difficult and genocide an impossibility, as history's record shows.
Does AG Reno's not appointing a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton's illegal fundraising and his often impeachables somehow not amount to Clinton having Reno in his pocket? That Bill Clinton was in the happy position of a mob boss who owned the city chief of police seems the inescapable conclusion, because of this and other peculiar decisions by the AG. Subornation, as I said. Roughly every third professional decision she took smelled funny, and protected the Clintons from the consequences of malfeasances both singular and ongoing. That's too much bias to ignore.
Note the conspicuous lack of such goings-on among the Bush-era Attorneys General, from Alberto Gonzales on. Of course, you'll holler loudly, “But what about this awful crime thing and that that Gonzales did, this that and the other too?!” But you'll notice not even Dennis Kucinich, who has given cause for his sympathy for democracy to come under question, is trying to indict the former Attorney General. Gonzales' record is one of fighting the war. His opponents' record is one of hollering that he should not be fighting the war. Say what? Whose side are these people on again? Sure as hell doesn't look like they're on democracy's, also understandable as humanity's. Trying to criminalize democracy's victory over tyranny is both unconscionable and unwise. It's not difficult to call it insane.
Janet Reno is reported unable to pass a background check in this article – and the claim is made that therefore, for the first time in the history of background checks for Attorneys General, none was made.
http://www.laborers.org/NorCal_Reno.html
Damning, really. No wonder I think she was suborned.
The Cato Institute didn't much like her tenure either.
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-395es.html
Oliver North, interviewing Florida attorney Jack Thompson, who crops up in a couple other links here. “But Thompson now says he is convinced the administration wanted a "dirty cop" for their attorney general.” Datelined August 12 1998.
Link:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/janet.htm
And more to come... I can keep this up for months, guys.