Quote:
Originally Posted by Aliantha
Well this is the crux of the problem.
Let's say for the sake of argument that you can legally make a bomb as a weapon under the rights stated in your constitution, and you intend to use it on someone. Why is it legal for you to do that, but it's not legal for you to be arrested because you have that weapon and you're planning on killing someone with it. Why is it only legal to arrest you after you've done the killing?
Surely that makes no moral sense what so ever.
|
If you can prove that I'm planning to kill someone with a gun (or a bomb, etc), you can arrest me for conspiracy to commit murder, and be perfectly constitutional about the whole thing.
I fail to see your point. Perhaps I'm just not reading you right. Could you clarify it?