Quote:
Originally posted by juju
You know, you're pretty smart... and I respect you for that. But what you've described in the second paragraph is <i>your fault</i>. If you hadn't attacked her, she wouldn't wouldn't feel like you're threatening her worth as a person. She wouldn't have closed her mind to your point of view (a defense mechanism) and would then have been more receptive to what you had to say.
|
Well you're close anyway. Perhaps if you read the the start of the thread, you'll notice that
I did not attack her first. Here, let me quote it for you so you don't have to find it:
Quote:
Originally posted by LUVBUGZ
Believe it or not, my reply post was mainly for Stonan. I am a huge animal right's advocate, but I don't appreciate "wanna-be's" who randomly go around sticking their 2-cents in saying everything under the sun is animal abuse and then quietly leaving without defending their position. It makes the rest of 'us' who actually try to do something about animal abuses look like blubbering idiots and then we are left to deal w/ the Quzah's of the world. I was kinda testing Stonan to see if he/she has what it takes to come into the Cellar and make a remark like that. I was trying to find out if Stonan is someone I could make future alliances w/ regarding animal right's stuff or if he/she is just an uninformed trouble-maker. This has yet to be seen and I'm waiting to hear back from Stonan.
Enjoy the ham sammie, Quzah:p
|
And there you have it. I did not attack her directly. My first post in this entire thread was a general response, quoting UT. But then, it's all how you look at it I suppose. I mean, how do you take the sentence:
" It makes the rest of 'us' who actually try to
do something about animal abuses look like blubbering idiots and then we are left to deal w/ the Quzah's of the world."
Attack? No? Yes? You decide. But that was the first. Tootles.
Quzah.