Quote:
Originally Posted by tw
Show us that you do more than post wisecracks. Since solutions were posted repeatedly~snip~
|
Nope - I have not seen one post of yours present ANY original thought or solution. Simple regurgitations of that which was previously published in The Economist do NOT count. Try again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tw
Anyone can read The Economist and numerous other publications.
Many readers simply seek facts that agree with their political agenda – ignore everything else.
Those solutions have been posted repeatedly. tw, Show us that you read to understand; not read to simply reinforce a political agenda. You can answer your own question IF you comprehended what contradicts political bias.
|
True, anyone can read The Economist as tw has repeatedly posted to a point beyond redundancy. PLEASE POST original solutions and/or suggestions without quoting The Economist - just once. No mental midgets or 85% of top management allowed. Criticism will not work either. Since tw has such a high opinion of him/herself, this should be easy and should take no more than two paragraphs. No political agenda, nor biases allowed. Now please try again. Oh and answering a question by directing another poster to answer if for you doesn't count either. That would amount to simply attacking another poster which we all know tw would never do.
