The Cellar - View Single Post

Undertoad · 08-01-2003, 10:27 AM

John might be his actual name, but he goes by Jay.

If I'm waggling, it's just because I want the Ds to run their best politically-viable candidate. I think the country is far better served by a 51-49 outcome than a 60-40 outcome, no matter which side wins. I understand the Dean phenomenon, but I think he's a 60-40 outcome a la McGovern.

Personally I think right now my vote would go Lieberman first, then Bush, then Edwards, then Kerry, then Dean, then the pack. It is thrilling to be an independent swing voter. I admit my biases here so that y'all can judge what I say based on it.

D, I understand the reluctance wrt Lieberman and censorship completely, it's just that I think he'd be mostly harmless in that regard. All the candidates have something wrong with them.

08-01-2003, 10:27 AM	#35
Undertoad Radical Centrist Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Cottage of Prussia Posts: 31,423	John might be his actual name, but he goes by Jay. If I'm waggling, it's just because I want the Ds to run their best politically-viable candidate. I think the country is far better served by a 51-49 outcome than a 60-40 outcome, no matter which side wins. I understand the Dean phenomenon, but I think he's a 60-40 outcome a la McGovern. Personally I think right now my vote would go Lieberman first, then Bush, then Edwards, then Kerry, then Dean, then the pack. It is thrilling to be an independent swing voter. I admit my biases here so that y'all can judge what I say based on it. D, I understand the reluctance wrt Lieberman and censorship completely, it's just that I think he'd be mostly harmless in that regard. All the candidates have something wrong with them.