You do understand that the bank was bailed out by both parties so that it might stay in business, right? a very large part of that business is loaning money to entities capable of timely repayment at an acceptable rate of return. One of the two parties that <strike>oppress<out> serve us seems a reasonably safe investment for a bank to make. Yeah, I'd say the same if it was the DNC as well.
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin
|